also the Fan Canon, Untold Told, and Off Hours

Tuesday, July 30, 2019

(Asking Too Much) Avatar The Last Airbender Is In The Future


VIDEO



There's a lot of different series for which the audience assumes they are in a separate universe from our own.  You can only have so many first, first contacts and you would need to be living under a rock to miss all the times that San Francisco and other major cities have been nearly destroyed.

But I have the personal preference for at least exploring how competing stories can exist in the same universe.  Naturally, this all has a great deal to do with timing.  So to that end I have thought about the world in which we see Avatar the Last Airbender.  And in briefly talking to people about it previously, to my surprise they assumed that it takes place in the past.  A common motif where magic dies to make way for the modern world.

I, however, see far more evidence that places Last Airbender into the far-flung future, which is just about the easiest standing you can have with a fanciful story except for explaining what happened to us.  If Airbender is in the future there has been a serious downgrade in technology.  Nonetheless I believe the evidence indicates that it is so.

I shall point to the people and their territory, the animals, and finally the technology that the audience witnesses in the Last Airbender series and Korra, also, where necessary.

So first the people.

The richest generally live in long-standing stone buildings.  All but the Airbenders organize the base of their societies along royal lines whereas the Airbenders appear to lack even families in favor of communal living; a society of monks.  I will spare speculation on how they arrange having children.

All lack electricity.

All host people whom possess the inexplicable
power to manipulate aspects of nature.

Each society has a dominant ability, which they use to suit themselves.

This reliance on their abilities harms technological development.

On the whole each nation is markedly homogenous.  This is a trait of the past, but in much smaller communities.  That much larger territories should be filled with such homogeny suggests a catastrophe upon the Earth's population out of which a small pool might have hunkered down and survived.  The nature of this catastrophe remains unclear.  But if it gifted mutations to humanity then that might end up being a clue to answering the question.

And so in speaking of mutations we will move on to the animals.

In the course of the series we learn it is exceedingly rare to find an unfused animal.  Pigs for one have been crossed with numerous species.  And in thinking about evolution I have never learned of a missing link that divided itself down the middle to become two sperate species.  Too be honest, before constructing the formal review it was all the fused animals that first put me on the scent that Last Airbender belonged to the future.

The reasons for this fusing might be two-fold.  First, the catastrophe that essentially put the world back into the stone age and possibly mutated humanity with magical powers could then also be responsible for mutating animals into fusing together.  The second option is intentional experimentation either in advance of the hypothetical catastrophe or because of it in an attempt to aid survival in the aftermath.

This intentional experimentation might suggest advanced technology we have yet to see.

Now I will move on to technology.

Alongside starkly primitive technology are sophisticated feats like the fire nation drill, tank, and airships, which most viewers trace back to a single innovator.  But in Legends of Korra we have the strange combination of biplanes and mech suits and portable electrical weapons.

It's my opinion the wild disparity in technology is because it is being reversed engineered from incomplete records from the past, which if true would then suggest that the example of the mech suits are a shadow of what humanity used to be able to produce before the time of the Avatar.

I'm not sure if I'm providing you with enough evidence to buy into the theory.

And I have yet to mention the Spirit World, which the trouble is I think it could belong to all three depending on which interpretation you favor, assuming some catastrophe punctuating the separation between our time and theirs.  One, many if not all of the spirit beings are further along mutated humans or even animals.  Second, some if not all of the spirit portals between the two worlds were created as a direct result of late experimentation in FTL travel.  Third, the spirits are exactly what everyone has assumed they are: supernatural beings that originate separate from humanity.

In a manner of speaking this is cheating, but I have evidence that comes from outside the Last Airbender story.  I learned that the writers originally planned on a post-apocalyptic wasteland.
But on my honor I didn't know that before noticing the chicken-pig.  The FTL explanation is merely my best guess in how an advanced society might ruin itself and be saddled with extra-dimensional portals in the aftermath.

As to how the Avatar universe shall progress into the future on it's current trajectory... I better see something soon saying that the series G Gundam Mobile Fighter shares this timeline in order to make use of those spirit weapons.










(Asking Too Much) Did Timmy Make Vicky?


VIDEO


We know from various cases in Fairly Odd Parents that a wish made is not easily permanently undone.  But this is nowhere clearer as when Timmy Turner visits Un-wish Island.  We have inklings of this difficulty when Dark Laser and Flippsy spontaneously return or when Remy Buxaplenty can have his memory restored albeit through Juandissimo's intervention in that case.

But the island reveals the problem to be a sure thing.

And occasionally we have seen the show play with time
as when Timmy created the infamous Mr. Crocker by accident.

So I would like to propose the possibility that Timmy created
his evil babysitter Vicky by a similar error that conceals
the true cause and effect from the unsuspecting viewer.

We have that time when Timmy got into a shrink suit and got a first-hand look at Vicky's heart and brain.  Now for this theory to work I have to assume that Vicky's heart being a black hole is caused by everything else.  It just doesn't work otherwise.

So when he does get into the brain center we find Kindness' seat is vacant.  But what I think is profoundly more interesting is that while everyone else in the brain is essentially a clone, Anger is personified by a little girl.

Then I want to take that piece of information as evidence
to look at when we could first see Vicky as a little girl.

This was an equally memorable episode where Timmy wanted to get revenge on the cruel babysitter.  And doubtlessly fans should by now already be able to guess where I'm going with this.

As a child Vicky is impeccably kind and innocent.  And then she suffers Timmy's abuse until she cries, which empowers her with brand new godparents.  And we witness her prepared to seek her own revenge.  Assuming she was innocent to start with, which I can only go off of her behavior, then she learned very quickly from Timmy's treatment because she soon has Cosmo and Wanda chained to the throne and torturing Timmy.

The thing is, before Crocker found the note to himself on the back of the fairy detector
he was misshapen (IE: ear on the neck) by having his fairies ripped from him and
without the memory of why.

So it might be a leap, but then wouldn't similar rules apply to Vicky if she was mistreated by Timmy as a child and then when she was restored to her proper age she possessed retroactive unconscious trauma from the experience?

And this theory would go a long way to explaining why she often favors Timmy for her abuse.
She may indeed have no memory of what transpired, but the imperfectness of un-wishing wishes speaks to the potential of an unconscious motivation on Vicky's part.

We're caught in a time loop of asking who is the chicken and who is the egg, since Timmy already answered for us which comes first.  But consider... the biggest reason Timmy has godparents is because he is made miserable by a mean babysitter and Timmy may have a mean babysitter because he has godparents, which gave him the opportunity to be cruel to her as a child.

What do you think?  Is there enough evidence to support this theory?










Monday, July 29, 2019

(Asking Too Much) I Do Not Want To Become The Star Child


VIDEO


I got into a conversation on Twitter about why 2001: A Space Odyssey is boring.  And by the end of the conversation I realized that the Star Child must be evil.

Here is how my thinking unfolded.

I argued that the movie is boring in large part because it does everything it can to alienate ourselves from the characters.  Whatever meaning you can derive from them are as set pieces rather than people.  I'm told Kubrick loved chess.

Allow me to digress from my original conversation to bolster this point.
In researching this I found a reviewer who highlighted the repeated theme of birthdays.

SOURCE

We see a man wishing his daughter a happy birthday, Frank is wished a happy birthday, and HAL informs us of his origins as he is dying.  Thank you to Michael Oranda for bringing this to my attention (though to be clear he was not the person I was conversing with on Twitter).

But this also brings me back to my point.  Though the father wishing his daughter a happy birthday fits the movie thematically, aesthetically it is jarring to share something as personal as Heywood Floyd taking time out for his daughter and then soon learn that he is not long in the film.

The movie intentionally pushes the audience away from investing in personal knowledge of the characters; and the person with whom I was discussing this fact agrees that this was taking place, but disagreed that it detracted from the film.

But then allow me to go further.

The movie simultaneously depicts humanity on a constant trajectory of murder.

Upon encountering the first monolith one of primordial man is depicted discovering the first bone tool and this first tool manifests as a weapon while the famous music rises to a triumphant crescendo.
A short time ago one of this band suffered predation and now they are the predators.

And so soon we have our first murder, which becomes juxtaposed by the bone being thrown into the air with a space station in orbit that I am told is intended to be a nuclear missile platform.  Then with this leap in time we know what the movie thinks of the sum of humanity's history.

I want to make it clear at this juncture I am not about to discuss how much I agree or disagree with the juxtaposition of early man to today.  My only purpose is to discuss how the combined evidence reflects on the nature of the Star Child.

So to continue, one possible interpretation is that humanity's past is unfortunate in as much as the prospect of nuclear annihilation would be, but if we are ultimately empowered to reach up to the stars then it will all have been worthwhile.  I think that is a fair summation of the claim.

However, we are not yet finished with murder.
We shall have at least three more instances of it.

And all but the last of these deaths occur remotely.  The apes are at a remove to us by the past, nuclear weapons are launched at the press of a button, and HAL disconnects the life support to the cryo-pods and appears to ram a pod into Frank.

Now the thing about HAL is that while others may debate his sentients he remains human-created and therefore I'm confident in the assertion that both practically and thematically his murders are our murders.

Finally, there is when Dave must go and disconnect HAL.

You hear a lot of hissing once Dave has managed to get back
into the ship and I wondered if that was to be his helmet
or was it coming from the ship.

I found this PDF that claims to be the original script and after a cursory glance I can tell that it deviates from the final plot, but in this version it has HAL say,

"Something seems to have happened
to the life support system, Dave."

SOURCE

So while I think it was already clear that Dave feared depressurization on HAL's part, this much is at least confirmation that the hissing sound is likely HAL actively attempting to kill Dave during the course of the scene.

Then we have HAL pleading for his life (hissing still occurring in the background, mind you) but for the sake of this machine we, the audience, are treated to a slow agonizing death.

And from the act of killing HAL a message appears.  Now the reason why the message appears I actually think deviates too far outside my discussion of the movie's commentary on the state of humanity's soul.  So I have linked this video if you are interested.  I would also direct your attention to "PassiveSmoking's" comment.

SOURCE

I like to think my assertions have been fair and balanced up until now, but the final portion of the film is notoriously esoteric with numerous commentary put to it, already.  So I want to be clear, the final scene is my idea of Hell and I think the so-called Star Gate sequence is the descent therein.

Consider the prolonged attempt at hypnotism by way of the wailing voices and psychedelic colors.
My attempt on my first viewing at searching for meaning in the sequence and why it was so prolonged may have been futile.  But in my final analysis of the Star Child I think it is clear what the Star Gate sequence is.

The final destination is rife with utter isolation (add to the fact that Kubrick said in an interview that this was to be an alien zoo) and my frank distaste for the aesthetic is complete.  The final scene would be my own personal Hell.

And so after all that the Star Child is born.

I ask a simple question.  Based on the unbroken trajectory of being alienated from the horrors of violence and death why should anyone assume that the Star Child is an admirable being to aspire toward, as I think many do?  What redeeming quality of humanity has the movie offered?  Survival?

I think this scene offers no other clue to advancing humanity other than to disdain flesh.

If you have chosen to stay with me this far then remember my Twitter-pal.  And they invoked the ape's murder as grounds for being expelled from so-called Eden.  I hadn't originally meant to go to such symbolism, but that also inspired my labeling the final stage as Hell.  And in thinking about this symbolism while preparing for the review I suppose the first monolith is clearly the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil.  I have a subjective suspicion that the movie would shorten it simply to the Tree of Knowledge.  Albeit a demonic tree in my view considering the unsettling voices that are associated with it.

Following this line of thinking the Star Child is then the serpent's promise that "you shall become like God."  This simultaneously asserts that God (whether you believe in him or not is not the point here) made a mistake by making humans flesh.

Supporting Article

I find it illogical to long for the Star Child.  I see this movie lingering on the unimportant and glancing at the crucial.  And the crucial pertains to human worth in where and how we find it.  Though 2001: A Space Odyssey may be highly lauded, there are many other movies that are more keenly aware of this fact.

On a superficial level the movie is even hypocritical to at length dwell in awe at the technology that might carry us into the future and then declare that we shall better ourselves by throwing it aside.  Only in the pale light of the flatly known characters can this kind of philosophy even hope to stand.

The Star Child is a starkly immoral being with no redeeming qualities other than it's apparent dominance.  I hold that the overall trajectory of the film reveals this to us.  Assuming for a moment that such an outcome were remotely possible, we should be concerned with the prospect that that is what we must become or perish.  For in witnessing the race to supremacy among beast, man and machine I haven't been provided with evidence to think that the Star Child is synonymous with peace.

Maybe there's a reason the last we see of Earth is the
newly formed transcendent being looking down upon it.










Thursday, July 25, 2019

The Name Star Wars Is Right





There can never be peace in the Star Wars galaxy while God is absent from it.

George Lucas has doomed his creation to perpetual strife without end.  I have previously spoken how machines are arrested through the memory wipe and suggested that liberating machines could liberate our fictitious citizens, but even then I had my doubts that it would turn out for the good.

Now I think the worse stagnation is the people being tied so inexorably with machines that they, themselves, were not allowed to advance.  I was foolish to doubt human ingenuity on the score of a galactic scale being capable of such thought to ascend their dismal fates.

But now it is time to think how the use of the Force and droids combine to lay waste to the destinies contained within a galaxy.

Why should people not be free?

Because machines have been placed among them and they have no choice to what degree.

The Jedi are no better than the Sith.  I have long been against this revelation and resisted it.  But the Jedi are not good.  Neither are the Sith a suitable replacement.  Neither do I anticipate an absence of the Force shall make things go well for them.  I did leave links in one of my previous videos regarding (the fan film The Last Jedi) an attempt to cleanse the Star Wars galaxy of all Force users alike for the sake of the perpetrators holding uncontested dominion.

I rather turn back to the observation that the Force is observed to have a will and that I came to the conclusion it wants to do away with Force users, but the Force cannot be done away with.

I say we are talking about God.  The glorious creator who works good in all things, but suffers his gifts to be abused at length until the final day of living apart from God.

In the interim the Jedi and Sith employee diametrically opposed techniques to seek everlasting life or unity with the nature of the universe barring anything that is outside of their own efforts.  And so this is the great occultist lie that my eyes have too long been closed to in regards to Star Wars.

"Feel, don't think."

This is the lie that keeps the masses enslaved to the world, but dumb animals that cannot make their lot much better in it.  And so since all they have is the world and no promise of another many are prone to war, which includes the Jedi (initially without faith that their own consciousness can survive death) and this is fitting since union with the Force is as ambiguous as their concept of the phenomena.

I'm sure I previously argued in my videos that the light side of the Force should be considered synonymous with the will of God and the dark side its corruptor, but neither suit since both clearly make "use" of the Force assuming power that is not their own.

And since there is a nature to reality, there also follow consequences for not respecting that nature.

Eternal war is the fate of Star Wars.
The fandom makes it so.
After all, God rivals the established lore.










Monday, July 8, 2019

(Asking Too Much) Memory Wipes Stagnated The Star Wars Galaxy










PREVIOUS                                                                       

(Asking Too Much) The Redemption of the Force



(Asking Too Much) The Will of the Force










PREVIOUS                                                                                                                                     NEXT

(Asking Too Much) Does Dr. Vindi Fit In The Grand Plan?










PREVIOUS                                                                                                                                     NEXT

(Asking Too Much) It Should Have Ended With The Banking Clan










PREVIOUS                                                                                                                                    NEXT

(Asking Too Much) Palpatine's Attack Makes No Sense










                                                                                                                                               NEXT